Categories
Home
Electrolysis Questions
Hair Removal General Question
Laser Hair Removal Questions
Permanent Hair Removal Questions
Site Map
 
 
   
is there a laser hair removal facility in Hamilton or Toronto Ontario. Is this process expensive?

Question:
is there a laser hair removal facility in Hamilton or Toronto Ontario. Is this process expensive?


Answer:
There are several clinics here in Toronto. I do not know about Hamilton. The treatments are very expensive, and the results are not permanent. As a Canadian, it is important that you understand that we have very ineffective government regulations of medical devices. First of all, for most devices, such as lasers, manufactuers can sell them by simply filing a three page Device Notification Form with the Medical Devices Bureau in Ottawa. By law, the devices must be safe and effective; however, the manufactuers are not required to provide any proof prior to marketing their product. They are on the honour-system, so they must be able to provide proof of safety and effectiveness on demand, but that would only happen if the government receives many complaints about a device. Even worse, there is a huge loop-hole in the way the regulations are interpretted, which permits doctors or health-care facilities to circumvent them, by simply importing devices directly. How bizarre! According to my reseach, so far, none of the several different hair-removal lasers being marketed in Canada have even been registered with the Medical Devices Bureau. Also, beware of claims that a particular laser hair-removal system has "U.S. FDA approval", because that is absolutely false. As of 7 March 1997, the FDA has given 3 laser hair-removal devices "clearance to market", but all that means is that they are substantially equivalent to other dermatological lasers marketed in the past. The FDA's main concern is risk. As long as FDA is reasonably convinced that the laser is unlikely to injur people, when used as directed, then clearance to market is virtually assured. There is also a requirement that evidence of effectiveness be provided, to support any marketing claims; however the standards of proof are not very great. Nevertheless, not one of the hair-removal lasers has managed to convince the FDA that they can provide "permanent", "long-term", or "pain-less" hair-removal. The most they are allowed to claim, is that they reduce hair for up to three months. That is pathetic. Also, beware of false and deceptive claims by the medical clinics that offer the laser hair-removal treatments. I have telephoned 5 clinics in various Canadian cities, some more than once, and each time I was given what I believe to be deceptive information. The most common pitch is that the system was designed for permanent hair-removal, but because it is so new, they do not have enough proof to be able to make permanence. Then they tell you that there are ongoing clinical trials in the U.S. and/or Europe, and that some people have had excellent long-term results. It is all B.S., designed to deceive consumers into believing that permanence is possible, even probable, despite that fact that the clinics cannot claim it. Another very common pitch is to claim that hair grow in cycles, so you will need multiple or on-going treatments to treat new hairs or ones that were previously dormant. Now there is a grain of truth to this, in that hair does indeed go through various growth cycles, including periods of dormancy. However, the hair-removal scam devices use this fact to con customers into believing that what is actually regrowth of previously treated hair is new hair. This is called "managing patient expectations". They plant the lie in your mind at the start, so that the you will be easier to con when the hair grows back. The way to shut them up, is to ask for a written guarantee. They won't give you one. Also, beware that you will most likely be asked to sign a consent document. Should you decide to try a treatment, read it very carefully, and be certain that you are not being asked to sign away any legal rights. Nobody knows the long-term effects of laser treatments. If in doubt, have your lawyer review the document. As I said earlier, the costs are very high. To clear a male person's back, they offer a one year treatment program. The cost of the initial treatment is between $3,300 and $4,600, depending on the person's size. Since I an 6 foot 5 inches, I would be charged $4,600. Then there are up to three follow-up treatments, which cost $1,000 each. GST at 7 percent is extra. So I could be charged up to $8,100 to clear the hair, and there is no guarantee of permanence, and no reason at all to expect it. Go ahead and ask how many treatments will be required in following years, and see if they give a straight answer. Since the treatments are temporary, they should be compared to other temporary treatments, like waxing. A wax jobon the back wil cost about $30, and the results are good for between 4 and 6 weeks. If we take the worst case, that would mean about 12 treatments per year, or about $360. That is 23 times less than the laser. Also, I have learned that the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Company) consumer protection program, Marketplace, has just broadcast a story on laser hair-removal. I do not have full details, but as I understand it, they covered the story of a woman who paid thousands of dollars for treatments and was dissatisified. I hope to have the transcript e-mailed to me by tomorrow afternoon. In any case, the program will be rebroadcast on the CBC Newsworld cable channel, on Saturday March 15, at 6:30 AM Eastern Standard Time. That's right AM not PM! You may wish to set your VCR for that program - it runs 30 minutes. Marketplace has a pretty good reputation for thoroughness, but I will reserve judgement until I have read the transcript and seen the program. The only method of hair-removal that has been widely recognized as providing permanent results is needle type electrolysis. I had excellent results with the method called The Blend. I have spoken to the relevant person at FDA, who has confirmed that only needle electrolysis is allowed to claim permanence, because it has had over 100 years to prove itself. For any kind of hair-removal treatment, I recommend having a small test area treated, and then waiting for at least 3 months - the longer the better, and then compare the rate of regrowth. Even among electrologists, there can be huge differences in results. But we especially wary of any non- needle, or tweezer, or laser devices, because they are very controversial to say the least. If you wish further information, I will be pleased to direct you to the relevant persons at FDA or Medical Devices Bureau.



Submit your comment or answer


 
| Home | Electrolysis Questions | Hair Removal General Question | Laser Hair Removal Questions | Permanent Hair Removal Questions | Site Map |
Privacy Policy